Federal Land Rent Hike Reveals the Need for Streamlined Renewables Permitting

The pandemic has been exceptionally difficult for U.S. clean energy. Nearly 600,000 clean energy workers have lost their jobs since March, and now the industry has a new problem—rent is due.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has responsibly approved more than 11,000 megawatts of clean energy projects on federal land. And in 2018, the U.S. Department of the Interior decided to stop charging rent on these projects in response to company complaints that the previous administration had raised the rent too high compared to rent on private property.

Renewables top coal in power generation for first time

Americans used more energy from renewable sources last year than from coal for the first time since 1885 - when coal replaced wood as the dominant fuel source, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Monthly Energy Review.

Coal accounted for 11.3 quadrillion British thermal units of energy in 2019, a 15% decline from the prior year, and total renewable energy consumption grew by 1%. This outcome mainly reflects the continued decline in the amount of coal used for electricity generation over the past decade as well as growth in renewable energy, mostly from wind and solar.

IRS Extends Renewables Tax Credit Deadline By A Year

The Internal Revenue Service on Wednesday issued guidance extending the placed-in-service deadline for both the production tax credit for renewable energy facilities under section 45 of the Internal Revenue Code and the investment tax credit for energy property under section 48.

The new guidance gives wind and solar developers an extra year to meet so-called safe harbor requirements to qualify for the tax credits. The Treasury Department decision applies to projects that get under

The IRS notice is here.

“Treasury’s decision is welcome news for the renewable energy sector, which has been struggling with the government-mandated shutdowns along with the rest of the country,” said Robert Dillon, executive director of the Energy Choice Coalition. “This provides sorely needed flexibility for an industry that has lost an estimated 600,000 jobs in the past three months.”

The notice extends the safe harbor requirement from four to five years for projects that started construction in 2016 or 2017, which is beneficial for projects that have been delayed by supply chain or financing delays.

New Jobs Reports Detail Pandemic’s Grim Impact on U.S. Renewables

The far-reaching implications of a global pandemic has disrupted every facet of the economy. Local markets across the nation are reeling in response to an economic downturn previously unheard of in scope and size.

Clean energy—a fast-growing industry only months ago and a significant job creator for more than a decade—is now dealing with rampant job loss, as new development activities and investments have been stifled in the wake of COVID-19.

Energy Choice Coalition Signs Letter to Energy & Commerce and Energy & Natural Resources Committees on Competitive Electricity Markets

Energy Choice Coalition Signs Letter to Energy & Commerce and Energy & Natural Resources Committees on Competitive Electricity Markets

The country is experiencing a public health and economic emergency, the full impact of which will not be fully understood for some time. Given the foundational role that electricity plays in unlocking virtually all economic activity in the United States, it is vital that Congress take full advantage of any opportunity to lower consumer electricity costs and expand jobs and economic activity in the electricity sector.

COVID-19 Relief Measures for Renewables

We recently shared analyses by Wood Mackenzie and various industry associations about the pandemic’s impact on our nation’s transition to clean energy. In short, all energy sectors, including renewables, have been hit hard and will need significant time to recover. However, they all saw plenty of opportunities in the post-COVID marketplace.

The question for lawmakers is how to hasten recovery with specific policy solutions. Certainly, a number of measures could be added to upcoming stimulus packages, or they could be passed à la carte. Many small businesses operate in these sectors and have received some support from the third stimulus package, and Congress should double down on economy-wide solutions that help them.

Wood Mackenzie, Industry Associations Report Coronavirus Impact on Energy Transition

Wood Mackenzie, Industry Associations Report Coronavirus Impact on Energy Transition

With over half of the world’s population and most of the United States under lockdown because of the COVID-19 pandemic, energy demand has dropped to levels not seen in decades. It has all happened so quickly that reliable analyses of the impact on the energy sector have been changing rapidly. Even now, no one knows what will unfold the next few weeks let alone months or years. But early estimates are coming in, and they are troubling.

One of the most trusted authorities on the energy sector is Wood Mackenzie. This consultancy firm that began in the 1970s by developing expertise in upstream oil and gas has broadened its focus to deliver the same level of detailed insight for every interconnected sector of the energy, chemicals, metals, and mining industries it now serves around the world.

Virginia Ratepayers Should Keep an Eye on the State Senate

Virginia’s monopoly utility, Dominion Energy, lost a major battle Wednesday when the Virginia Senate approved a bill restoring state regulators' oversight of how electric utilities can write off certain costs. Dominion has strongly opposed the vote and was able to convince the Senate to reconsider, putting off a final decision.

The bill’s fate is still uncertain as it remains one of the most contentious topics between the Senate and the House as this year's legislative comes to a close on Saturday.

South Carolina Legislature Commits to Study Retail Electricity Choice

South Carolina is currently not among the handful of states that allow residents to choose their energy supplier, but that could soon change. The state legislature is weighing a proposal to create a study committee to look at the benefits of residential energy choice. The past year has seen a wave of momentum among states looking to adopt retail energy choice. The center point of this movement has been in the South, where states like Virginia, Florida, and the Carolinas have pushed grassroots efforts to increase competition in their power markets.

Energy Choice in Arizona: Current Status and Next Steps

The battle to grant American consumers a choice in their energy provider is a state-by-state fight, and one that has seen over a dozen individual states find success. In contrast, a handful of other states are ground zero for this push to continue reaching new communities.

Arizona is one of those states ripe for progress, and in fact, has among the brightest spotlight being shined on it by both energy choice advocates and the opponents who want to see utilities retain their monopolies.

In Middletown, Pennsylvania, the Battle for Energy Choice Gets Hyperlocal

In Middletown, Pennsylvania, the Battle for Energy Choice Gets Hyperlocal

As those who fight for the freedom of energy choice know, the ability to choose a power supplier opens doors for individual customers. A single household or commercial entity can evaluate which energy suppliers align most with their needs, whether through lower prices, increased flexibility and personalization in rate structure, a greater presence of renewable energy, or otherwise. The mere presence of open competition on the energy market, meanwhile, shifts the motivations of power providers. The utilities will see they can no longer automatically default to monopolies, but rather they must earn the business of customers, like every other industry across the country.

In Northeastern States, Energy Choice Under Attack as Electricity Retailers Get Restricted

In Northeastern States, Energy Choice Under Attack as Electricity Retailers Get Restricted

Much of the attention in the realm of energy choice recently has been in the southern United States, with the Energy Freedom Act in the Carolinas, the Florida Supreme Court striking down the energy choice ballot initiative, and the Virginia Energy Reform Act. But as 2020 comes into full swing it has become clear that the Northeast is an integral battleground.

In the past, northeastern states have been great examples of the benefits of energy choice and the successful implementation of such programs. But those who want to restrict energy choice are fighting in these states to take away the freedom of energy choice.

Virginia Energy Reform Act

Virginia Energy Reform Act

Virginia will be the next battleground state to see if utility monopolies are going to continue to be able to deny consumers the ability to choose their energy. VERC, the Virginia Energy Reform Coalition, has introduced a bill to end monopoly control of Virginia energy systems and expand consumer choice. It’s called the Virginia Energy Reform Act, and it’s a bipartisan bill to establish a competitive energy retail market. It would include consumer protections and education, creation of an independent grid operator, and phase out wholesale capacity markets. 

R Street submits public comments on FERC's proposed changes to PURPA

The energy team over at R Street submitted comments this week to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) on proposed changes to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) regarding the rules governing qualifying facilities (QF) and longterm purchase agreements in wholesale competitive markets.

Michael Haugh at R Street writes: “Competitive wholesale markets are one of the best ways to provide low cost, efficient power to customers. A recent study by the U.S. Energy Information Association found that between 2008 and 2017, more than 103 gigawatts (“GW”) of renewable generation have come on line, but only 14 GW are certified as a QF. This shows that renewable generation has evolved to become competitive with traditional generation sources. Along with RPS enacted by states, robust wholesale markets have provided stable revenues for renewable generators. Many states hold competitive auctions to procure resources for their RPS requirements, which create a market for renewable generators. These markets limit the necessity for the QF designation and the long-term purchase agreements that come with it. The QF purchase agreements can lead to a suppression of the market in the instance where a QF does not win, or even participate in, a state RPS auction and then requires the state to honor the QF obligation. Situations like these can lead to higher overall costs for the utility customers which, in turn, defeat the purpose of the competitive solicitation.”

Read R Street’s full comments here. The FERC docket number is RM19-15-000. Public comments are due later this month. Further details about FERC’s proposed rulemaking to modernize PURPA is available at FERC.gov.